“Beginning” is what surrounds us, vision is our main sense and therefore we live in reality, which we limit ourselves to.

 

"Freedom of conscience"! If now, during the “Kulturkampf” (Bismarck’s legislation in favor of a secular state - ed.), they wanted to remind the liberals of their old slogans, then this could only be done in this form: Everyone should be able to practice their religious, as well as physical , needs(link) without the police poking their noses into it. But the workers’ party should have taken advantage of this opportunity and expressed its conviction that bourgeois “freedom of conscience” represents nothing more than tolerance for all possible types of religious freedom of conscience, and that it, the workers’ party, on the contrary, strives to free the conscience from religious Datura.

“The Five Skins of Man”: “Epidermis”, “Clothing”, “Human House”, “Social Environment and Identity” and “Global Environment - Ecology and Humanity”. Hundertwasser

“The only possibility is to incite people to a new revolution. If they are so stupid as to come up with new ideas on their own, then they must admit that they are stupid.”

​

On August 31, 1907, the Entente alliance was established. Throughout the 19th century, alliances were made and collapsed several times per decade. For example, Russia broke off relations with France alone four times, joined the blockade against England, and then again fought with the Napoleonic army. The agreements were given the name of unions, which are not fundamentally different from the concept. At the end of the century, Germany made a sharp turn in diplomacy. She moved away from Russia in favor of friendship with Austria-Hungary. Chancellor Bismarck believed that his two neighboring countries, the great powers France and Russia, would never find a common language. These political regimes were too different. One was an autocratic monarchy, the other was dominated by the spirit of a republic. In order not to be left alone and to gain the favor of St. Petersburg, in 1890, 27 political emigrants, oppositionists from Russia, were suddenly arrested in France. The pleased Emperor Alexander III remarked: “Finally there is a government in France.” Thus began the artificial Russian-French friendship. St. Petersburg newspapers wrote: “The two powers, bound by natural friendship, have such formidable force of bayonets that the Triple Alliance must stop involuntarily in thought.” The Triple Alliance centered on Germany and Austria. If France and Britain at the end of the 19th century were able to resolve all their differences, then when Russia fought with Japan, the British unconditionally supported Japan. There were still unresolved issues with the British about Tibet and Afghanistan. In 1907, Russia made concessions in order to conclude an agreement. Afghanistan has since fallen out of its sphere of direct influence, but a new major partner, England, has emerged. By 1913, Britain was in second place in foreign trade turnover after, not surprisingly, Germany. Well, and the most important military ally. The last point in the formation of the Entente was set after the start of the joint war with Germany, on September 5, 1914. The powers agreed to combine military efforts. But the union was short-lived. With the arrival of the Bolsheviks, Russia immediately fell out of this union. Therefore, when today they write history textbooks and divide paragraphs about World Wars I or II, the totality of events goes into the shadows and judgments come down to maneuvers in specific territories and not events as a whole, there is too much “truth” in the chaotic division of facts for the sake of some logic, does not come to the surface. Firstly, this is a struggle for power in already existing territories, on the other hand, the formation of new territories through the formation of new alliances, including under a new ideology. It is very difficult to “see” in such delays, but the most important thing is impossible to know for sure. When we or we are told a story, we hear what we got because it happened in a certain way and the reality pushes us to wrong conclusions, among other things, because what we know for sure is only today, but today we don’t know for sure, because this will be clear only tomorrow, so if “yesterday” is influenced today, then one can conclude about it how much it will stand the point of view of the majority of those who are ready to “come to terms with” the given, and then among the enlightened, for others the “truth”, that is, the decision will be a given , like air, due to the absence of even the question itself, why does it make sense to change the past or doubt it?

 From 1917 to 1922, Russia was wracked by a terrible civil war. The number of those killed in battles, executed, died from hunger and epidemics reached 19-21 million people, 12-13% of the population. 2 million emigrated to foreign lands. The revolution of 1917 was the result of a dirty conspiracy, it involved Germany, the governments, intelligence services and banking circles of England and the USA. Russia was their main competitor in the world economy, and so it was thrown into chaos. The Bolsheviks, having seized power, showed themselves to be the most cruel and unprincipled of the revolutionary parties. By demagoguery they attracted the mob, selfish people, and criminals to their side. It was proclaimed: “Rob the loot”! The country was overwhelmed by terror, pogroms, and violence. In opposition to the Reds, the White Guard rose up: officers, students, high school students, and Cossacks. Province after province was liberated, and the inhabitants of the tormented cities greeted the deliverers with honors. In the areas occupied by whites, law and order and normal human life were established. Kiev professor A. Goldenweiser wrote: “The era of volunteers was an era of revival and restoration of everything destroyed by the Soviet regime.” At the time of their greatest success, in the fall of 1919, their troops numbered 260-270 thousand bayonets and sabers, and the Red Army - 3.5 million. They had to fight not only with the Reds, but also with anarchists, with “greens”, with Caucasian and Ukrainian separatists. During the years of the civil war, they agreed only on the fact that Russia should remain “united and indivisible.” Everything around was contrary to democracy and valor, “fighting for the truth” was impossible, external alliances promised disorientation. The “whites” who “believed” in the Entente found themselves in false, occupied places, falling “into the clutches of the enemy”; those who were dressed as red for their salvation or fight also could not always even save their lives. Those fighting for the unity and territory of the post-empire entered into alliances with anyone, with the Makhnovists, nationalists, as long as they were needed, then they easily crushed them. “Knightly” loyalty to the Entente allies played into the hands of the latter in this case. English Prime Minister Lloyd George openly stated in parliament: “The advisability of assisting Admiral Kolchak and General Denikin is all the more controversial because they are fighting for a united Russia. It is not for me to indicate whether this slogan is consistent with British policy.” Streams of Russian gold, raw materials, works of art, church valuables poured in for a penny, plants, factories, and mines were given out in concessions, and the allies of dubious Russia also took part in the plunder of Russian property. The American banker Thompson cynically wrote to Lloyd George that Russia would become "the greatest trophy of war the world has ever known." On August 1, 1914, the first military conflict on a global scale began. The war was fought between two coalitions of powers - the Entente (Russia, France, Great Britain) and the countries of the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy; since 1915 - the Quadruple Alliance: Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria) - for the redivision of the world, colonies, spheres of influence and investment of capital. Facts of the First World War in the 20th century The USA, Germany and Japan began to outstrip Great Britain and France in economic development and lay claim to their colonies, Germany was actively vocal on the world stage, the colonies of Great Britain, Belgium and the Netherlands were threatened with capture, there were many incidents in Alsace and Lorraine, the battle around the change of power and for the regime in Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic states that were previously under the authority of the Russian Empire, the trophies of the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria seemed on the horizon, Was the alliance between Austria-Hungary and Italy genuine and who was going to combine with whom and in what (in ultimately) ideology converge. Since the scale involved in revolutions *changes of power and views) peoples-territories could have this impact on themselves for related efforts and threats of other rivals who required demonstrative power in the world, so to speak, religion or economic doctrine.

The historical facts of the results and development of the First World War push us to the following conclusions: the discord that “reigned” in Europe was initially the argument of all its participants as long as the monarchy “reduced” in favor of parliament following England and the USA as Culture and the growth of the economic class in favor of the capitalist leadership or strengthening of new economic doctrines as a degree for its subjects, like a faith that obliges as a measure to be in existence through its dissemination in connection with the recognition of its legitimacy only because of the number of those who agreed and subscribed to it, thereby the founders since they give it the opportunity again and again to manifest itself after the fact of those who give birth to it. Thus, among the Christian world of Europe, there were general arguments in favor of peace in connection with the presence of “distant countries”, territories far from the peaceful life of Europe and capable of serving as a cause of peace between these “rulers” from among the states closely neighboring each other who thus decide the right to be such “individual countries” among the future participants of the “EU”. The struggle led to a new strategy for a new redistribution of the world, which two decades later led to the Second World War of 1939–1945, even more destructive in its consequences. Thus, at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919–1920, the League of Nations was established, in connection with this “peace in the world,” as well as the Treaty of Versailles 1919 and the Treaty of Saint-Germain 1919. The Ottoman Empire and Austria-Hungary collapsed, a whole series of new states - Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Finland, Yugoslavia. Since it is customary to call the murder of the Serbian prince the reason for the outbreak of the First World War, the assassination of the Yugoslav King Alexander I in Marseille on October 9, 1934, that is, exactly 8 months after the creation of the union, and eight days after the “Balkan Pact” was registered in the series of treaties of the League of Nations. Fascist Italy attacked Greece from the territory of Albania, and none of the pact allies helped the latter. Thus fascism could also be the "free hands" of the pure persons of government or unofficial government as the agreed measure of Europe in relation to the world and the picture of it before the Christian Crown, with all its trappings as white power, as today according to my opinion the same scheme on the territory of the United States, a clearly white nation from the same league, demonstrates the discord of half-blooded Ukrainian-Russians in front of Americans of different rights: -Afro and, for example, German - “Einstein” or other “ideological” mestizo -Franco-Einstein or other “refugees”, in contrast to African immigrants, who could not but settle in America.